A Guide for Bringing the SAMR Model to iPads by Patricia Brown

Summary:

A Guide for Bringing the SAMR Model to iPads was a terrific article to explain the SAMR model in an easy to understand format.  Patricia Brown points out the importance of shifting from apps to content when implementing new technology.  Apps can be very overwhelming; especially since there are so many options available.  The author explains each component of the SAMR model by using a visual created by Tim Holt that uses Starbucks as a comparison.  The four steps of the SAMR model are:  Substitution, Augmentation, Modification, and Redefinition.  The author points out that this model is like a menu.  There are lots of different options and you won’t always want the same thing.  Like when at Starbucks, some days you may want a plain coffee, while other days you may want a Pumpkin Spiced Latte. 

The first component in the SAMR model is Substitution.  When you use a new technology in the classroom to complete the same task, but incorporating technology you are using substitution.  For example, you would have students type a paper using Google Drive rather than writing with paper and pencil.  This would be like ordering a black coffee from Starbucks rather than getting it at home.  It’s the same sort of coffee you could have at home, but you bought it instead.

The second component is Augmentation.  This occurs when you use technology to complete a task and that technology incorporates new features that wouldn’t be available without the technology.  So, relating to the coffee comparison, instead of black coffee, maybe you add creamer or ice.  It’s still the same coffee, but you’ve spiced it up a bit.  An example of Augmentation in the classroom would be using a tablet to read books and students clicking on words they don’t know and looking up definitions, synonyms, etc.

The third part of the SAMR model is Modification.  This indicates there is an actual change to the task by adding in a technology aspect.  So, thinking of the coffee, in this component, the augmented coffee has some bells and whistles added to it.  For example, the iced coffee might have flavoring or whipped cream added to it.  Thinking of technology, we could be using multimedia to add video, audio, or visuals to projects using programs like Garbage Band or the iMovie app. 

          The last part of the SAMR model is Redefinition, which means completely changing the task at hand due to the technology.  Instead of just making your Starbucks coffee fancier, you actually order something completely unique and special to Starbucks like the Pumpkin Spice Latte.  When teachers use modify their lessons for the use of technology, they are going beyond the four walls of their classrooms and requiring the students to use critical thinking skills.  Students might have virtual book club discussions, virtual field trips, or communicate with others by using Google Hangouts, Skype, etc. 

Reflection:

          I would love to learn more about the SAMR model.  When I went to the ICE conference in St. Charles in February, many of the presentations were about this model and how it should be used in schools.  I knew very little about what the model was so I did not attend a session.  Now that I’ve learned more about the model, I wish I had!  Our district struggles with meeting AYP from year to year and we are always trying to figure out ways to improve our students’ scores.  Often we hear about technology tools that will be helpeful. I think it is so important to remember that for technology to change our scores however, we need to make the sure the technology has value and is being used appropriately.  As teachers we are always saying we need to follow Bloom’s Taxonomy and provide students with challenging activities rather than just simple fill in the blank type work.  This should be true when using technology tools as well.  We have classrooms in our school with iPads and it seems for the most part that they are used to “play” using apps.  Even in my own classroom, I know there is so much more I could be doing with my Chromebooks.  The students are so eager to communicate and create things.  This article opened my eyes to the fact that I need to step up what I’m having my students do when using all of the technology I fight for.

Brown, P. (2015, February 6). A Guide for Bringing the SAMR Model to iPads. Retrieved from https://www.edsurge.com/n/2015-02-06-a-guide-for-bringing-the-samr-model-to-ipads

How Technology Can Boost Student Engagement by Liane Wardlow

Summary:

In the article, How Technology Can Boost Student Engagement, Liane Wardlow points out the benefits technology can have in the classroom, especially regarding student engagement.  The article starts with a statistic from Gallup’s 2013 State of America’s Schools reporting “that 55% of students are engaged in the learning process, while 28% are not engaged, and 17% are actively disengaged.  Wardlow points out that technology could be one of the key factors in increasing student engagement.  Technology can be used as a tool by teachers to create and present content.  Instruction is then more interesting and relevant to students and they become more engaged and active in their learning.  Students can also be more involved in their learning by using the technology to create and share things. 

Technology can engage students not only individually, but in groups as well.  A school in Meridan, Idaho has been working to use technology in ways other than individual students glued to a screen.  Instead, they have students work collaboratively to create and learn using technology.  As part of the article, Wardlow includes a video featuring the Idaho school.  Students and teachers discuss the use of technology as part of their education.  The end of the video includes three guiding questions to consider: 

1.  How can I plan digital activities that maintain student interest, engage them in deep learning, while still meeting standards?  
2. How can I create an environment for students to monitor their own progress while setting and reaching goals.  
3. How can I use technology seamlessly throughout my lessons to enable student interaction with content while enlisting student responses?

Increased student engagement leads to increased scores and better attitudes toward learning.  The goal is that a variety of technology tools being used in classrooms will help reach the half of currently disengaged students.

           

Reflection: 

            There were two portions of the article that I found most interesting.  First, there is a quote by an educator stating that by students having technology in front of them they are able to create and innovate things.  By having students using things like Photoshop or other programs they are able to create completely unique projects.  Later in life, they can become artists, filmmakers, or web designers.  This really struck me because often when I see technology being used in our school, it is very simple implementation.  Sometimes it’s watching videos, playing games, practicing math problems.  I think it’s important to remember the idea of using technology for students to create things and think critically.  I have Chromebooks for every student and after reading this article it is more evident that I need to plan more involved lesson plans.

            This leads to the second portion of the article that I found interesting.  I thought the guiding questions in the video will be extremely beneficial in helping create engaging and challenging activities using technology.  I think these questions would be beneficial for our entire school to consider when using technology.  Unfortunately we do not have a computer teacher in our building.  Students have 30-60 minutes of computer time per week, however the teachers are completely in charge of planning how the time is spent.  Teachers really need to consider implementing activities that will engage students while challenging them at the same time.

Wardlow, L. (2014, May 1). How Technology Can Boost Student Engagement - Pearson Research & Innovation Network. Retrieved from http://researchnetwork.pearson.com/elearning/technology-can-boost-student-engagement